Now this I can see sence in, burning rubbish to produce power.

Great idea, better than being reliant on Gas

southy wrote:
Now this I can see sence in, burning rubbish to produce power.

Can't you just blow down one end?

From environmental point idea may be appealing.

If the heat produced by incinerator is used for producing electric, is there any more left for this scheme? If so using it can be good idea, if it helps environment project deserves consideration.

BUT some of us will need convincing that this is the actual brain child of Dear Leader...

How come he who has been busy slipping upon banana skins since May has managed to coordinate so much so fast?....

Or have the sales team of some firm worked hard to sell this scheme?

Or was this proposal doing its rounds before NuLabour got into power recently and now Dear Leader has decided to exploit it as 'pie in sky' for saving his own skin from political heat, which got created because NuLabourites misled people before election on many issues and now their hypocrisy of Blair proportions is getting exposed?

Personally I want to believe this scheme because of seductively Green argument, BUT can we trust administration that contains self confessed liars?

Have they not admitted in Council that complete 'LIE' was casually signed off over certain resignation?

Did their Councillor not tell Echo she was going to "Move heaven and earth" to save Oaklands pool but voted for cuts?

Sorry to say it is Dear Leader and his poodles own fault that NuLabour has lost most of the trust, considering even our two councillors who are members of NuLabour did not believe in twin talk of their colleagues it is hardly surprising.

Try piping hot air from the council chamber; enough to keep the whole city going!

I fully support the incinerator, it's a fantastic facility but how about some of that cheap electricity for Marchwood residents or using the money generated to build local cycle paths?? Afterall, we are the ones who have to live with the lorries bringing the waste in, and risk our lives if we want to cycle on Jacobs Gutter Lane.

Run it close enough to the bed of the River Test and we could be enjoying ready cooked Salmon.

Paramjit Bahia wrote:
From environmental point idea may be appealing. If the heat produced by incinerator is used for producing electric, is there any more left for this scheme? If so using it can be good idea, if it helps environment project deserves consideration. BUT some of us will need convincing that this is the actual brain child of Dear Leader... How come he who has been busy slipping upon banana skins since May has managed to coordinate so much so fast?.... Or have the sales team of some firm worked hard to sell this scheme? Or was this proposal doing its rounds before NuLabour got into power recently and now Dear Leader has decided to exploit it as 'pie in sky' for saving his own skin from political heat, which got created because NuLabourites misled people before election on many issues and now their hypocrisy of Blair proportions is getting exposed? Personally I want to believe this scheme because of seductively Green argument, BUT can we trust administration that contains self confessed liars? Have they not admitted in Council that complete 'LIE' was casually signed off over certain resignation? Did their Councillor not tell Echo she was going to "Move heaven and earth" to save Oaklands pool but voted for cuts? Sorry to say it is Dear Leader and his poodles own fault that NuLabour has lost most of the trust, considering even our two councillors who are members of NuLabour did not believe in twin talk of their colleagues it is hardly surprising.

For gods sake Parmi use the word 'The' now and then and stop making your (sometimes) reasonable posts so hard to read.

Paramjit Bahia wrote:
From environmental point idea may be appealing.

If the heat produced by incinerator is used for producing electric, is there any more left for this scheme? If so using it can be good idea, if it helps environment project deserves consideration.

BUT some of us will need convincing that this is the actual brain child of Dear Leader...

How come he who has been busy slipping upon banana skins since May has managed to coordinate so much so fast?....

Or have the sales team of some firm worked hard to sell this scheme?

Or was this proposal doing its rounds before NuLabour got into power recently and now Dear Leader has decided to exploit it as 'pie in sky' for saving his own skin from political heat, which got created because NuLabourites misled people before election on many issues and now their hypocrisy of Blair proportions is getting exposed?

Personally I want to believe this scheme because of seductively Green argument, BUT can we trust administration that contains self confessed liars?

Have they not admitted in Council that complete 'LIE' was casually signed off over certain resignation?

Did their Councillor not tell Echo she was going to "Move heaven and earth" to save Oaklands pool but voted for cuts?

Sorry to say it is Dear Leader and his poodles own fault that NuLabour has lost most of the trust, considering even our two councillors who are members of NuLabour did not believe in twin talk of their colleagues it is hardly surprising.

Good post Paramjit ........ Or was it loosehead ........ or was it aldermoorboy ........ or was it George somebody.
.
Posted just like a doubting Tory

Many thanks for insults.

Does everybody who dares to question NuLabour automatically become a Tory?

Oh well I can take comfort from what Tony Benn said on TV few years ago, when asked if he agreed with Ted Heath on some subject. His answer was "These days Ted is on the left of Mr. Blair".

Considering under Dear Leader cuts are even more brutal than under members of self confessed ‘Nasty Party” wonder if asked and provided with all the facts what Tony Benn will say about NuLabour in Southampton…

Paramjit Bahia wrote:
From environmental point idea may be appealing.

If the heat produced by incinerator is used for producing electric, is there any more left for this scheme? If so using it can be good idea, if it helps environment project deserves consideration.

BUT some of us will need convincing that this is the actual brain child of Dear Leader...

How come he who has been busy slipping upon banana skins since May has managed to coordinate so much so fast?....

Or have the sales team of some firm worked hard to sell this scheme?

Or was this proposal doing its rounds before NuLabour got into power recently and now Dear Leader has decided to exploit it as 'pie in sky' for saving his own skin from political heat, which got created because NuLabourites misled people before election on many issues and now their hypocrisy of Blair proportions is getting exposed?

Personally I want to believe this scheme because of seductively Green argument, BUT can we trust administration that contains self confessed liars?

Have they not admitted in Council that complete 'LIE' was casually signed off over certain resignation?

Did their Councillor not tell Echo she was going to "Move heaven and earth" to save Oaklands pool but voted for cuts?

Sorry to say it is Dear Leader and his poodles own fault that NuLabour has lost most of the trust, considering even our two councillors who are members of NuLabour did not believe in twin talk of their colleagues it is hardly surprising.

Good post.
>
" if it helps environment project deserves consideration"
Yes.
>
"he who has been busy slipping upon banana skins since May"
Yes, with unfailing regularity! The current council seem to be in total disarray and the idea of them making decisions of any kind, fills me with dread.

On the inside wrote:

Paramjit Bahia wrote:
From environmental point idea may be appealing. If the heat produced by incinerator is used for producing electric, is there any more left for this scheme? If so using it can be good idea, if it helps environment project deserves consideration. BUT some of us will need convincing that this is the actual brain child of Dear Leader... How come he who has been busy slipping upon banana skins since May has managed to coordinate so much so fast?.... Or have the sales team of some firm worked hard to sell this scheme? Or was this proposal doing its rounds before NuLabour got into power recently and now Dear Leader has decided to exploit it as 'pie in sky' for saving his own skin from political heat, which got created because NuLabourites misled people before election on many issues and now their hypocrisy of Blair proportions is getting exposed? Personally I want to believe this scheme because of seductively Green argument, BUT can we trust administration that contains self confessed liars? Have they not admitted in Council that complete 'LIE' was casually signed off over certain resignation? Did their Councillor not tell Echo she was going to "Move heaven and earth" to save Oaklands pool but voted for cuts? Sorry to say it is Dear Leader and his poodles own fault that NuLabour has lost most of the trust, considering even our two councillors who are members of NuLabour did not believe in twin talk of their colleagues it is hardly surprising.

For gods sake Parmi use the word 'The' now and then and stop making your (sometimes) reasonable posts so hard to read.

Sorry... Problem goes back to having learnt your lingo in India, teacher from Scotland was mostly drunk.... Hence the way I write

Paramjit Bahia wrote:

On the inside wrote:

Paramjit Bahia wrote:
From environmental point idea may be appealing. If the heat produced by incinerator is used for producing electric, is there any more left for this scheme? If so using it can be good idea, if it helps environment project deserves consideration. BUT some of us will need convincing that this is the actual brain child of Dear Leader... How come he who has been busy slipping upon banana skins since May has managed to coordinate so much so fast?.... Or have the sales team of some firm worked hard to sell this scheme? Or was this proposal doing its rounds before NuLabour got into power recently and now Dear Leader has decided to exploit it as 'pie in sky' for saving his own skin from political heat, which got created because NuLabourites misled people before election on many issues and now their hypocrisy of Blair proportions is getting exposed? Personally I want to believe this scheme because of seductively Green argument, BUT can we trust administration that contains self confessed liars? Have they not admitted in Council that complete 'LIE' was casually signed off over certain resignation? Did their Councillor not tell Echo she was going to "Move heaven and earth" to save Oaklands pool but voted for cuts? Sorry to say it is Dear Leader and his poodles own fault that NuLabour has lost most of the trust, considering even our two councillors who are members of NuLabour did not believe in twin talk of their colleagues it is hardly surprising.

For gods sake Parmi use the word 'The' now and then and stop making your (sometimes) reasonable posts so hard to read.

Sorry... Problem goes back to having learnt your lingo in India, teacher from Scotland was mostly drunk.... Hence the way I write

:-) LOL

No mention of the Tory councils plans to do exactly this?
Theres a pipeline already under the water from near this plant & the tories were looking at pumping this into the east of the city.
I suggested a similar thing with waste hot water from the new(proposed) Bio Mass generator.
I'm happy Labour's going ahead with another Tory idea but surely they should give credit to the last Tory council for looking into it & doing the ground work for them?

This idea is no better than burning coal, oil or gas.

southy wrote:
Now this I can see sence in, burning rubbish to produce power.

The idea of siphoning heat from the incinerator, possibly to pipe it to homes in Woolston and Weston, was first floated by the previous Conservative administration three years ago.
so you agree another great Tory idea then?

Paramjit Bahia wrote:
Many thanks for insults.

Does everybody who dares to question NuLabour automatically become a Tory?

Oh well I can take comfort from what Tony Benn said on TV few years ago, when asked if he agreed with Ted Heath on some subject. His answer was "These days Ted is on the left of Mr. Blair".

Considering under Dear Leader cuts are even more brutal than under members of self confessed ‘Nasty Party” wonder if asked and provided with all the facts what Tony Benn will say about NuLabour in Southampton…

Didnt think you would be that offended or felt insulted.
.
Didnt say you were a tory just suggested that it had a Tory slant to it.
.
As regards Tony Benn ...... a great politician ...... didnt always agree with all of his comments though

loosehead wrote:

southy wrote:
Now this I can see sence in, burning rubbish to produce power.

The idea of siphoning heat from the incinerator, possibly to pipe it to homes in Woolston and Weston, was first floated by the previous Conservative administration three years ago.
so you agree another great Tory idea then?

The idea go's back even before the Torys was in power, Councillor Pat Bear was a Councilor when I first the posibilitys of it. It be a waste of time piping using warm water or warm air has would need more engery to pump it around, but to produce Electric would be a lot better and tap into the national grid.
It would not be green, but you would be using an engery source that would be wasted.

Why do we have to have a bloody horrendous eyesore in the docks for a power station. Burn the wood in the incinerator at Marchwood.

loosehead wrote:

southy wrote:
Now this I can see sence in, burning rubbish to produce power.

The idea of siphoning heat from the incinerator, possibly to pipe it to homes in Woolston and Weston, was first floated by the previous Conservative administration three years ago.
so you agree another great Tory idea then?

Ideas, ideas, ideas!! But they didnt enact them though didnt they. All talk.

My cat is the traditional black and white type.
When he was a kitten, he was cute like the one in the felix advert.
Now he is older, he looks like a badger.
He rarely stays in the house all night, particularly in the warmer weather.

loosehead wrote:

southy wrote:
Now this I can see sence in, burning rubbish to produce power.

The idea of siphoning heat from the incinerator, possibly to pipe it to homes in Woolston and Weston, was first floated by the previous Conservative administration three years ago.
so you agree another great Tory idea then?

No .... cant find any evidence of that little gem either loosehead.
.
Must be in your imagination...... Again

Lone Ranger. wrote:

loosehead wrote:

southy wrote:
Now this I can see sence in, burning rubbish to produce power.

The idea of siphoning heat from the incinerator, possibly to pipe it to homes in Woolston and Weston, was first floated by the previous Conservative administration three years ago.
so you agree another great Tory idea then?

No .... cant find any evidence of that little gem either loosehead.
.
Must be in your imagination...... Again

Oh nearly forgot ....... It wasnt in their Tory manifesto either ...... Wonder why

Ant Smoking MP wrote:

loosehead wrote:

southy wrote:
Now this I can see sence in, burning rubbish to produce power.

The idea of siphoning heat from the incinerator, possibly to pipe it to homes in Woolston and Weston, was first floated by the previous Conservative administration three years ago.
so you agree another great Tory idea then?

Ideas, ideas, ideas!! But they didnt enact them though didnt they. All talk.

No disrespect to Dear Leader, he has only made a sound bite so far, so let us wait and see how many will trust their money in his hands by buying proposed bonds and when the project will actually be completed.

Sadly so far loosehead's post has answered one of the questions I raised i.e. Dear Leader appear to be doing his usual thingy, not telling the whole truth, that this scheme is not Dear Leader's brain child but was already there under dust. So I should be forgiven for thinking that 'Humphries' in Civic Centre may have taught him to play this pipe dream for securing favourable headlines.

Environment is most serious issue, all three main Parties are guilty of exploiting it for political opportunism. David Cameron by promising green actions to husky dogs and Prescott released lot of hot air on same subject but then driving petrol guzzling Jags.

Greens are the only party who are serious on this subject. Or we have some individuals like Alan Whitehead but will NuLabour let him become their spokesperson on environment? They have not done so far.

Lone Ranger. wrote:

loosehead wrote:

southy wrote:
Now this I can see sence in, burning rubbish to produce power.

The idea of siphoning heat from the incinerator, possibly to pipe it to homes in Woolston and Weston, was first floated by the previous Conservative administration three years ago.
so you agree another great Tory idea then?

No .... cant find any evidence of that little gem either loosehead.
.
Must be in your imagination...... Again

Please be nice to loserhead. He is either busy in Wetherspoons or spending all that hard earned taxpayers money passed on through DHSS benefits to his mortgage account when he was renting out. He is a delicate soul our loserhead. And worst of all he admits to being a Tory!!

loosehead wrote:

southy wrote:
Now this I can see sence in, burning rubbish to produce power.

The idea of siphoning heat from the incinerator, possibly to pipe it to homes in Woolston and Weston, was first floated by the previous Conservative administration three years ago.
so you agree another great Tory idea then?

Thanks for explaining the mystery, where the idea came from.

So far so good.....

BUT why no progress was made on pipe dream when your Cllr. Smith led lot were in power?

Was it because they were too busy implementing savage cuts or were not all that serious about environment.

I suspect both.

After all what can we expect from Party of David Cameron who flew to frozen north in a jet plane for getting his picture taken with a dog.

Pity that husky has not got a vote, otherwise it would consider seriously and ask what happened to Cameron's promises on environment.

I wish someone could find that husky now and take it to Downing Street, so that it may express its disgust by pis5ing on promise breaker

Ant Smoking MP wrote:

Lone Ranger. wrote:

loosehead wrote:

southy wrote: Now this I can see sence in, burning rubbish to produce power.

The idea of siphoning heat from the incinerator, possibly to pipe it to homes in Woolston and Weston, was first floated by the previous Conservative administration three years ago. so you agree another great Tory idea then?

No .... cant find any evidence of that little gem either loosehead. . Must be in your imagination...... Again

Please be nice to loserhead. He is either busy in Wetherspoons or spending all that hard earned taxpayers money passed on through DHSS benefits to his mortgage account when he was renting out. He is a delicate soul our loserhead. And worst of all he admits to being a Tory!!

DHSS - whatever's that? Don't think we've had one of those for years.

Oh dear. What a mistake!!! Well worth the effort of pointing it out. Next you will be telling us water is wet!!

Can i now chuck me quilt of me pad then ils frigging frezing in this cel!

ok who is very good with turbo diesel engines

bone banger.sorry mean lone ranger.bleat bleat bleat bleat bleat!!!!!!!

Up to date, at least two-thirds of the energy generated in thermoelectric and nuclear fission power plants is wasted as heat, because they use conventional steam turbines with limited conversion efficiency. Then by using a more efficient thermoelectric converter it is possible to recover most of the heat energy into electricity reducing drastically the worldwide thermal pollution. http://www.youtube.c
om/watch?v=Uqnk19hn7
Rc

Super news is that why my heating has gone up 18%.

It sounds a good idea on paper. I hope there's some action.

Fatty x Ford Worker wrote:
Super news is that why my heating has gone up 18%.

Temperature or costs?

OceansofRed wrote:
It sounds a good idea on paper. I hope there's some action.

As long as you recycle the paper rather than burning it!

Ant Smoking MP wrote:
Oh dear. What a mistake!!! Well worth the effort of pointing it out. Next you will be telling us water is wet!!

Enough's enough I'm fed up trying to explain to you my circumstances 35years ago.
as for Wetherspoons don't go in their & the last time I went to a pub was at my younger brothers funeral which was over two years ago.
I've tried to tell you that that sc*m tenant wrecked my house & it cost me far more to fix than I made in rent & I lost at least 3 times the amount collected in rents when I had to sell at a loss.
You can't admit being wrong & as I actually paid taxes on said rent & was acting with in the law please tell me in you're words what I've done wrong besides not agreeing with your point of view?
I'm biting my tongue at this moment in time as I don't want to lower myself to your level.
But explain what has that got to do with heating hey!

Fatty x Ford Worker wrote:
Can i now chuck me quilt of me pad then ils frigging frezing in this cel!

Padded I guess?

loosehead wrote:

Ant Smoking MP wrote:
Oh dear. What a mistake!!! Well worth the effort of pointing it out. Next you will be telling us water is wet!!

Enough's enough I'm fed up trying to explain to you my circumstances 35years ago.
as for Wetherspoons don't go in their & the last time I went to a pub was at my younger brothers funeral which was over two years ago.
I've tried to tell you that that sc*m tenant wrecked my house & it cost me far more to fix than I made in rent & I lost at least 3 times the amount collected in rents when I had to sell at a loss.
You can't admit being wrong & as I actually paid taxes on said rent & was acting with in the law please tell me in you're words what I've done wrong besides not agreeing with your point of view?
I'm biting my tongue at this moment in time as I don't want to lower myself to your level.
But explain what has that got to do with heating hey!

You certainly have an alchohol problem, lack of it!

Lone Ranger. wrote:

loosehead wrote:

southy wrote:
Now this I can see sence in, burning rubbish to produce power.

The idea of siphoning heat from the incinerator, possibly to pipe it to homes in Woolston and Weston, was first floated by the previous Conservative administration three years ago.
so you agree another great Tory idea then?

No .... cant find any evidence of that little gem either loosehead.
.
Must be in your imagination...... Again

Lone ranger that post was from the article & for you I've copied & pasted it again.
The idea of siphoning heat from the incinerator, possibly to pipe it to homes in Woolston and Weston, was first floated by the previous Conservative administration three years ago.
it was Matt Dean who proposed it so as I think it's great & agree with it all I'm asking is for credit to be given to where it's due.
If labour goes ahead with it I will say well done but to make out it's a new idea I will refute that.
Lone Ranger if you've followed my posts on the Bio Mass you will see/know I'm all for alternative green/greenish energies & will praise any party for going ahead with them

Paramjit Bahia wrote:

Ant Smoking MP wrote:

loosehead wrote:

southy wrote:
Now this I can see sence in, burning rubbish to produce power.

The idea of siphoning heat from the incinerator, possibly to pipe it to homes in Woolston and Weston, was first floated by the previous Conservative administration three years ago.
so you agree another great Tory idea then?

Ideas, ideas, ideas!! But they didnt enact them though didnt they. All talk.

No disrespect to Dear Leader, he has only made a sound bite so far, so let us wait and see how many will trust their money in his hands by buying proposed bonds and when the project will actually be completed.

Sadly so far loosehead's post has answered one of the questions I raised i.e. Dear Leader appear to be doing his usual thingy, not telling the whole truth, that this scheme is not Dear Leader's brain child but was already there under dust. So I should be forgiven for thinking that 'Humphries' in Civic Centre may have taught him to play this pipe dream for securing favourable headlines.

Environment is most serious issue, all three main Parties are guilty of exploiting it for political opportunism. David Cameron by promising green actions to husky dogs and Prescott released lot of hot air on same subject but then driving petrol guzzling Jags.

Greens are the only party who are serious on this subject. Or we have some individuals like Alan Whitehead but will NuLabour let him become their spokesperson on environment? They have not done so far.

Paramjit sorry if I stole your thunder but it wouldn't bother me who finished this project(started it) but at least give praise for a vision & commend it as worthwhile to proceed to the person who first suggested it.
If Labour do this I will congratulate them & hope they can do the same thing with the waste hot water from the Bio Mass if it goes ahead.
What's getting me is the fact that 25 years ago I was grieving & trusted a letting agent which proved wrong thing to do but even on this article Labour supporters are saying i live off tax payers money & i'm down the pub I hardly ever drink yet I can't seem to get it through their thick bigoted heads.
we don't agree on politics but at least we can debate with out name calling

J.P.M wrote:
My cat is the traditional black and white type.
When he was a kitten, he was cute like the one in the felix advert.
Now he is older, he looks like a badger.
He rarely stays in the house all night, particularly in the warmer weather.

Perhaps it really is a badger??
Does the creature usually stay in and sleep during the day??

southy wrote:
ok who is very good with turbo diesel engines

what do you need to know ?

Cyber__Fug wrote:

southy wrote:
ok who is very good with turbo diesel engines

what do you need to know ?

.. just about everything.

Nothing wrong with Wetherspoon's

lordshill loyal wrote:
bone banger.sorry mean lone ranger.bleat bleat bleat bleat bleat!!!!!!!

Lorshill loudmouth the person who shouts his gob off in public meetings.
.
Great that you keep up the reputation of your chosen abode.
.
Or are you just looking for a response loudmouth

loosehead wrote:

Lone Ranger. wrote:

loosehead wrote:

southy wrote:
Now this I can see sence in, burning rubbish to produce power.

The idea of siphoning heat from the incinerator, possibly to pipe it to homes in Woolston and Weston, was first floated by the previous Conservative administration three years ago.
so you agree another great Tory idea then?

No .... cant find any evidence of that little gem either loosehead.
.
Must be in your imagination...... Again

Lone ranger that post was from the article & for you I've copied & pasted it again.
The idea of siphoning heat from the incinerator, possibly to pipe it to homes in Woolston and Weston, was first floated by the previous Conservative administration three years ago.
it was Matt Dean who proposed it so as I think it's great & agree with it all I'm asking is for credit to be given to where it's due.
If labour goes ahead with it I will say well done but to make out it's a new idea I will refute that.
Lone Ranger if you've followed my posts on the Bio Mass you will see/know I'm all for alternative green/greenish energies & will praise any party for going ahead with them

Dont need to copy and paste for my benefit.
.
I have read it but can still see no evidence from the Tories and i am sure we would have had there been any content to it.
.
Dont believe everything you read in a Tory newspaper

Lone Ranger. wrote:

loosehead wrote:

Lone Ranger. wrote:

loosehead wrote:

southy wrote:
Now this I can see sence in, burning rubbish to produce power.

The idea of siphoning heat from the incinerator, possibly to pipe it to homes in Woolston and Weston, was first floated by the previous Conservative administration three years ago.
so you agree another great Tory idea then?

No .... cant find any evidence of that little gem either loosehead.
.
Must be in your imagination...... Again

Lone ranger that post was from the article & for you I've copied & pasted it again.
The idea of siphoning heat from the incinerator, possibly to pipe it to homes in Woolston and Weston, was first floated by the previous Conservative administration three years ago.
it was Matt Dean who proposed it so as I think it's great & agree with it all I'm asking is for credit to be given to where it's due.
If labour goes ahead with it I will say well done but to make out it's a new idea I will refute that.
Lone Ranger if you've followed my posts on the Bio Mass you will see/know I'm all for alternative green/greenish energies & will praise any party for going ahead with them

Dont need to copy and paste for my benefit.
.
I have read it but can still see no evidence from the Tories and i am sure we would have had there been any content to it.
.
Dont believe everything you read in a Tory newspaper

Funny that before the local elections we were calling the Echo a socialist paper?

Lone Ranger. wrote:

loosehead wrote:

Lone Ranger. wrote:

loosehead wrote:

southy wrote:
Now this I can see sence in, burning rubbish to produce power.

The idea of siphoning heat from the incinerator, possibly to pipe it to homes in Woolston and Weston, was first floated by the previous Conservative administration three years ago.
so you agree another great Tory idea then?

No .... cant find any evidence of that little gem either loosehead.
.
Must be in your imagination...... Again

Lone ranger that post was from the article & for you I've copied & pasted it again.
The idea of siphoning heat from the incinerator, possibly to pipe it to homes in Woolston and Weston, was first floated by the previous Conservative administration three years ago.
it was Matt Dean who proposed it so as I think it's great & agree with it all I'm asking is for credit to be given to where it's due.
If labour goes ahead with it I will say well done but to make out it's a new idea I will refute that.
Lone Ranger if you've followed my posts on the Bio Mass you will see/know I'm all for alternative green/greenish energies & will praise any party for going ahead with them

Dont need to copy and paste for my benefit.
.
I have read it but can still see no evidence from the Tories and i am sure we would have had there been any content to it.
.
Dont believe everything you read in a Tory newspaper

So Paramjit is a Tory?

loosehead wrote:

Paramjit Bahia wrote:

Ant Smoking MP wrote:

loosehead wrote:

southy wrote:
Now this I can see sence in, burning rubbish to produce power.

The idea of siphoning heat from the incinerator, possibly to pipe it to homes in Woolston and Weston, was first floated by the previous Conservative administration three years ago.
so you agree another great Tory idea then?

Ideas, ideas, ideas!! But they didnt enact them though didnt they. All talk.

No disrespect to Dear Leader, he has only made a sound bite so far, so let us wait and see how many will trust their money in his hands by buying proposed bonds and when the project will actually be completed.

Sadly so far loosehead's post has answered one of the questions I raised i.e. Dear Leader appear to be doing his usual thingy, not telling the whole truth, that this scheme is not Dear Leader's brain child but was already there under dust. So I should be forgiven for thinking that 'Humphries' in Civic Centre may have taught him to play this pipe dream for securing favourable headlines.

Environment is most serious issue, all three main Parties are guilty of exploiting it for political opportunism. David Cameron by promising green actions to husky dogs and Prescott released lot of hot air on same subject but then driving petrol guzzling Jags.

Greens are the only party who are serious on this subject. Or we have some individuals like Alan Whitehead but will NuLabour let him become their spokesperson on environment? They have not done so far.

Paramjit sorry if I stole your thunder but it wouldn't bother me who finished this project(started it) but at least give praise for a vision & commend it as worthwhile to proceed to the person who first suggested it.
If Labour do this I will congratulate them & hope they can do the same thing with the waste hot water from the Bio Mass if it goes ahead.
What's getting me is the fact that 25 years ago I was grieving & trusted a letting agent which proved wrong thing to do but even on this article Labour supporters are saying i live off tax payers money & i'm down the pub I hardly ever drink yet I can't seem to get it through their thick bigoted heads.
we don't agree on politics but at least we can debate with out name calling

Loosehead, As a socialist I may not share your Tory views, but will always defend your right to hold those. Fairness and truth are important pillars of socialism. So if Mat Dean (I have always gone on well with him) got the ball rolling on this, Yes his share of credit must be given.

This issue has serious side implications, the credibility of Dear Leader. For the sake of our city, whichever political party person like him may belong to should be made to face the music.

He was party to lies on Keith Morrell’s resignation. Misled even Labour voters before election through cleverly worded literature. And now has created the impression that he has worked wonders within few days by inventing a grand idea to save environment, thus trying to portray himself better than Alan Whitehead and Caroline Lucas put together, both of whom are very much committed to environment.

So YES he deserves to be exposed. If any of my colleagues on real or soft left want to keep on protecting him just because a private landlord (Yes he owns and lets few houses) is member of NuLabour then it is up to them.
I have no intention of behaving like members of North Korean Communists, because hero worshiping is Conservative tradition, it should never be part of Socialism.

Yes I have noticed some people latching on to your past as a landlord. I have never liked landlords since my student days, due to bad experiences. But yes I have sympathy with those landlords who come across some really bad tenants. So I can understand what you may have gone through. That type of person makes the life of most decent people looking for accommodation difficult.

While I may have cracked light hearted jokes about others social tastes, seriously I never blame anybody for their personal tastes. I do not believe people from left have been picking upon you because you booze or not, so please do not take that too seriously, they were probably just trying to wind you up.

Finally let us face facts; there are more contributors on this site with Tory views who write far worse, bordering on to abuse, than some on the left. I and most others just ignore them with contempt they deserve. It is probably because we the socialists are more tolerant.

loosehead wrote:

Lone Ranger. wrote:

loosehead wrote:

Lone Ranger. wrote:

loosehead wrote:

southy wrote:
Now this I can see sence in, burning rubbish to produce power.

The idea of siphoning heat from the incinerator, possibly to pipe it to homes in Woolston and Weston, was first floated by the previous Conservative administration three years ago.
so you agree another great Tory idea then?

No .... cant find any evidence of that little gem either loosehead.
.
Must be in your imagination...... Again

Lone ranger that post was from the article & for you I've copied & pasted it again.
The idea of siphoning heat from the incinerator, possibly to pipe it to homes in Woolston and Weston, was first floated by the previous Conservative administration three years ago.
it was Matt Dean who proposed it so as I think it's great & agree with it all I'm asking is for credit to be given to where it's due.
If labour goes ahead with it I will say well done but to make out it's a new idea I will refute that.
Lone Ranger if you've followed my posts on the Bio Mass you will see/know I'm all for alternative green/greenish energies & will praise any party for going ahead with them

Dont need to copy and paste for my benefit.
.
I have read it but can still see no evidence from the Tories and i am sure we would have had there been any content to it.
.
Dont believe everything you read in a Tory newspaper

So Paramjit is a Tory?

Like your sense of humour.

I can’t stand even Closet Conservatives of NuLabour so can never ever be a Tory.

Loosehead should learn that we on left have independent views, are not dictated by central office, so sometime end up disagreeing with each other. End of the day I will always respect my colleagues on both soft and real left and have faith in them. Period

loosehead wrote:

Lone Ranger. wrote:

loosehead wrote:

Lone Ranger. wrote:

loosehead wrote:

southy wrote:
Now this I can see sence in, burning rubbish to produce power.

The idea of siphoning heat from the incinerator, possibly to pipe it to homes in Woolston and Weston, was first floated by the previous Conservative administration three years ago.
so you agree another great Tory idea then?

No .... cant find any evidence of that little gem either loosehead.
.
Must be in your imagination...... Again

Lone ranger that post was from the article & for you I've copied & pasted it again.
The idea of siphoning heat from the incinerator, possibly to pipe it to homes in Woolston and Weston, was first floated by the previous Conservative administration three years ago.
it was Matt Dean who proposed it so as I think it's great & agree with it all I'm asking is for credit to be given to where it's due.
If labour goes ahead with it I will say well done but to make out it's a new idea I will refute that.
Lone Ranger if you've followed my posts on the Bio Mass you will see/know I'm all for alternative green/greenish energies & will praise any party for going ahead with them

Dont need to copy and paste for my benefit.
.
I have read it but can still see no evidence from the Tories and i am sure we would have had there been any content to it.
.
Dont believe everything you read in a Tory newspaper

Funny that before the local elections we were calling the Echo a socialist paper?

Echo like all others is in bussiness to make money. Most people from press have something common with oldest profession in the world, they will do whatever to mint money; in case of press slant stories to suit sales.

Cyber__Fug wrote:

southy wrote:
ok who is very good with turbo diesel engines

what do you need to know ?

I kind of sound that i have never encounter before on a car.

southy wrote:

Cyber__Fug wrote:

southy wrote:
ok who is very good with turbo diesel engines

what do you need to know ?

I kind of sound that i have never encounter before on a car.

I'm no expert on cars, but would it not be better to take the car to a Mechanic and ask them?

They can tell you what's wrong for free and give you a quote to fix it perhaps?

southy wrote:

Cyber__Fug wrote:

southy wrote:
ok who is very good with turbo diesel engines

what do you need to know ?

I kind of sound that i have never encounter before on a car.

Peter try a place in Empress Road it may still be there.
From your place go to Lodge Road >turn right into Bevios Valley> left by motor bike shop> right into Empress Road. Look for unit with MOT place on right in same parking there used to be a diesel specialist workshop.
If it is turbo on your old car, it may be cheaper to buy another. But this place will give you good advice. In past I and few mates have used them. Honest, reasonable and helpful place.
Stay away from main dealers, they will rip you off

IronLady2010 wrote:

southy wrote:

Cyber__Fug wrote:

southy wrote:
ok who is very good with turbo diesel engines

what do you need to know ?

I kind of sound that i have never encounter before on a car.

I'm no expert on cars, but would it not be better to take the car to a Mechanic and ask them?

They can tell you what's wrong for free and give you a quote to fix it perhaps?

The car i not going any where, not going to risk doing to much damage.

Paramjit Bahia wrote:

southy wrote:

Cyber__Fug wrote:

southy wrote:
ok who is very good with turbo diesel engines

what do you need to know ?

I kind of sound that i have never encounter before on a car.

Peter try a place in Empress Road it may still be there.
From your place go to Lodge Road >turn right into Bevios Valley> left by motor bike shop> right into Empress Road. Look for unit with MOT place on right in same parking there used to be a diesel specialist workshop.
If it is turbo on your old car, it may be cheaper to buy another. But this place will give you good advice. In past I and few mates have used them. Honest, reasonable and helpful place.
Stay away from main dealers, they will rip you off

I know its not the cam or the cam belt the warning light would of come up (belt is only 3 mths old), fearing the worse might be a the thrust bearing on the crank shaft.

southy wrote:

Paramjit Bahia wrote:

southy wrote:

Cyber__Fug wrote:

southy wrote:
ok who is very good with turbo diesel engines

what do you need to know ?

I kind of sound that i have never encounter before on a car.

Peter try a place in Empress Road it may still be there.
From your place go to Lodge Road >turn right into Bevios Valley> left by motor bike shop> right into Empress Road. Look for unit with MOT place on right in same parking there used to be a diesel specialist workshop.
If it is turbo on your old car, it may be cheaper to buy another. But this place will give you good advice. In past I and few mates have used them. Honest, reasonable and helpful place.
Stay away from main dealers, they will rip you off

I know its not the cam or the cam belt the warning light would of come up (belt is only 3 mths old), fearing the worse might be a the thrust bearing on the crank shaft.

Do you mean DBH engineering, going have a chat with Chaz at freeborns on monday, and Brian at Ashers

southy wrote:

southy wrote:

Paramjit Bahia wrote:

southy wrote:

Cyber__Fug wrote:

southy wrote:
ok who is very good with turbo diesel engines

what do you need to know ?

I kind of sound that i have never encounter before on a car.

Peter try a place in Empress Road it may still be there.
From your place go to Lodge Road >turn right into Bevios Valley> left by motor bike shop> right into Empress Road. Look for unit with MOT place on right in same parking there used to be a diesel specialist workshop.
If it is turbo on your old car, it may be cheaper to buy another. But this place will give you good advice. In past I and few mates have used them. Honest, reasonable and helpful place.
Stay away from main dealers, they will rip you off

I know its not the cam or the cam belt the warning light would of come up (belt is only 3 mths old), fearing the worse might be a the thrust bearing on the crank shaft.

Do you mean DBH engineering, going have a chat with Chaz at freeborns on monday, and Brian at Ashers

There is no Brian at Ashers, you need to speak with Greg or Danny

When the wood burner comes online North Solent area will have three large chimney smells, hopefully none will come my way at the same time. I can smell Fawley in Southampton occsionally but will all the combined smoke stacks at roughly the same altitude be a possible cause for smog?

Cyber__Fug wrote:

southy wrote:

southy wrote:

Paramjit Bahia wrote:

southy wrote:

Cyber__Fug wrote:

southy wrote:
ok who is very good with turbo diesel engines

what do you need to know ?

I kind of sound that i have never encounter before on a car.

Peter try a place in Empress Road it may still be there.
From your place go to Lodge Road >turn right into Bevios Valley> left by motor bike shop> right into Empress Road. Look for unit with MOT place on right in same parking there used to be a diesel specialist workshop.
If it is turbo on your old car, it may be cheaper to buy another. But this place will give you good advice. In past I and few mates have used them. Honest, reasonable and helpful place.
Stay away from main dealers, they will rip you off

I know its not the cam or the cam belt the warning light would of come up (belt is only 3 mths old), fearing the worse might be a the thrust bearing on the crank shaft.

Do you mean DBH engineering, going have a chat with Chaz at freeborns on monday, and Brian at Ashers

There is no Brian at Ashers, you need to speak with Greg or Danny

Brian retired now I take it, I give those to a try Thanks Cyber

Sounds a positive move, and much better to use 'existing' resources to produce heat instead of chopping down yet more trees! instead of government money being chucked at schemes which aren't sustainable have dubious 'green' credentials. Glad to hear about the solar panels too, HCC at least are ahead on that. We should see more organisations like the hospital, university, etc investing in long-term energy saving as well as individual household responsibility.

freemantlegirl2 wrote:
Sounds a positive move, and much better to use 'existing' resources to produce heat instead of chopping down yet more trees! instead of government money being chucked at schemes which aren't sustainable have dubious 'green' credentials. Glad to hear about the solar panels too, HCC at least are ahead on that. We should see more organisations like the hospital, university, etc investing in long-term energy saving as well as individual household responsibility.

A Question of you & other posters if you were offered Solar Panels for free by the Government would you have them?
I have al;ready accepted & I'm saving (hopefully) on my Electricity bills

How do you go about getting them free from the government?

skin2000 wrote:
How do you go about getting them free from the government?

you can only have them if one side of the roof is facing south, and there is no obstructions like Trees or buildings.
be careful lo if you do get them, high winds will damage the roof, where there is a air pressure difference on one side of the panel to the other side and starts to lift, A few around here have found that they now have leaks in there roofs.

southy wrote:

skin2000 wrote:
How do you go about getting them free from the government?

you can only have them if one side of the roof is facing south, and there is no obstructions like Trees or buildings.
be careful lo if you do get them, high winds will damage the roof, where there is a air pressure difference on one side of the panel to the other side and starts to lift, A few around here have found that they now have leaks in there roofs.

Absolute cr*p. they actually are attached to the roof beams & help ptotect the tiles & extend their lives

skin2000 wrote:
How do you go about getting them free from the government?

Skin contact Southern Energy Solutions before the end of the month as the Tariff changes in Sept. & they're not doing it after that time.
You lease the roof space to them & if any damage happens through the panels they repair the damage.
they help protect the panels extending their lives you get free electric in day light hours or at least a reduced cost ( depends on strength of light) they make money from the electricity you don't use